Skip to main content
All Comparisons

GPT-5.2 vs Claude 4 Opus: Complete Comparison 2025

Which AI Assistant is Better for Your Needs?

Last updated: January 2025

🟢GPT-5.2

93

Overall Score

VS
🟠Claude 4 Opus

92

Overall Score

The AI landscape in 2025 is dominated by two powerhouses: OpenAI's GPT-5.2 and Anthropic's Claude 4 Opus. Both represent the cutting edge of large language model technology, but they take distinctly different approaches to AI assistance. In this comprehensive comparison, we'll examine every aspect of these models to help you choose the right one for your needs.

Language Understanding & Generation

GPT-5.2 demonstrates exceptional fluency across 95+ languages with near-native quality output. Its contextual understanding has improved dramatically with a 200K token context window. Claude 4 Opus counters with its signature coherent, nuanced writing style and a massive 300K token context window, making it ideal for analyzing lengthy documents. Both excel at creative writing, but Claude tends to produce more naturally flowing prose while GPT-5.2 offers more variety in tone and style.

GPT-5.292/100
Claude 4 Opus94/100
Winner: Claude 4 Opus

Coding & Technical Tasks

GPT-5.2 has made significant strides in code generation, now supporting 50+ programming languages with improved debugging capabilities. It integrates seamlessly with VS Code and other IDEs. Claude 4 Opus shows remarkable strength in understanding complex codebases and providing detailed explanations. For pure code generation speed, GPT-5.2 edges ahead, but Claude's code review and refactoring suggestions are often more thorough and actionable.

GPT-5.295/100
Claude 4 Opus91/100
Winner: GPT-5.2

Reasoning & Analysis

Both models demonstrate advanced reasoning capabilities, but they approach problems differently. GPT-5.2 excels at mathematical reasoning and structured problem-solving, scoring highly on benchmarks like MATH and GSM8K. Claude 4 Opus shines in nuanced ethical reasoning and understanding complex scenarios with multiple stakeholders. For scientific research and data analysis, both perform exceptionally well.

GPT-5.293/100
Claude 4 Opus93/100
Winner: Tie

Safety & Alignment

Anthropic's Claude 4 Opus leads in safety research and alignment, with robust refusal of harmful requests while remaining helpful. GPT-5.2 has improved its safety measures significantly but occasionally shows inconsistency. Claude's Constitutional AI approach makes it more predictable in edge cases. For enterprise use cases requiring strict content policies, Claude offers more reliable guardrails.

GPT-5.288/100
Claude 4 Opus96/100
Winner: Claude 4 Opus

Multimodal Capabilities

GPT-5.2 supports image, audio, and video input with impressive accuracy. It can analyze charts, understand memes, and even generate images through DALL-E 4 integration. Claude 4 Opus recently added vision capabilities with strong document and image analysis, though it currently lacks audio/video support. For comprehensive multimodal workflows, GPT-5.2 offers more versatility.

GPT-5.296/100
Claude 4 Opus85/100
Winner: GPT-5.2

Our Verdict

Both GPT-5.2 and Claude 4 Opus are exceptional AI models. Choose GPT-5.2 for multimodal tasks, coding speed, and ecosystem integration. Choose Claude 4 Opus for long-document analysis, nuanced writing, and safety-critical applications. With LazySusan, you get access to both—no need to choose!

Get Access to Both (and 50+ More)

Why choose one AI when you can have them all? LazySusan gives you GPT-5.2, Claude 4 Opus, and 50+ other premium AI tools for one low price.